Gandhi and Jesus – The history
Debi Prasad Choudhary
Los Angeles
About Mahatma Gandhi, Albert Einstein said,
"Generations to come, it may well be, will scarce believe that such a man
as this one ever in flesh and blood walked upon this Earth.” Perhaps he, like
many physicists, was skeptical of “history recordings”, which often presents
the perspective of historian and not so much what happened. Also, there is no
way to verify them in an active manner like we do in physics. Gandhiji's1
last words were supposed to be “Hay Ram2” (है राम - Oh God). That is the
version of girls escorting Gandhi to the evening prayer site. Recently, I came
across the version of another person from my native state of Orissa, who was
working as a gardener in
Birala House3, where Gandhiji was killed. He did not hear
any such words, he heard only a sound of pain some thing like “Ahhh..”.
Gandhiji was falling down on to the ground after three bullets entered his
frail body from a point blank distance.
I can imagine the situation. My
father says, when Gandhiji used to fast in New Delhi, people in my remote town,
that is located 1674 km away, were fasting!! On his 100th birthday,
when I was in class 5th, our entire village worshipped him like a
God. So, I can imagine the situation at his death site. I imagine an absolute shock
that could have put many people in blank mind. Even, two associate of
Gandhi-killer could not believe what happened, as the entire world was rushing
towards the Birala House. So, constructing the exact historical account of what
Gandhiji said at the time of death is futile. I rely on my image of Gandhiji
and believe that he said “Hay Ram”, because any other version is equally true
or false.
Like Gandhiji, I am equally fascinated with the life of Jesus
Christ, who walked upon this earth with flesh and blood some 2000 years ago. My
interest in this character got renewed today after attending a very interesting
and enjoyable lecture by Dr. Bart D. Ehrman from University of North Carolina on “Does The Bible Present a Historically
Accurate View of Jesus?” I draw parallel to Gandhiji’s death in history to
illustrate how difficult it is to get the facts in the history of important
moments. Dr. Ehrman said that the account of Jesus’s death by two apostles does
not match. One of them write that Jesus said “"Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do”. The other
apostle says, "My God, my God, why
have you forsaken me?” In one case, Jesus seems to be in full control of
the situation and generous, in the other he is helpless. Similarly, other
apostles say different things that are not consistent, perhaps factually.
Let us, for a moment, imagine the
situation of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, when he was nailed on a cross and
hanged. The gruesome feeling, fear and shock of seeing a man, whom one loves
and admires, in such a situation would haunt any body throughout the life. The
apostles, who were admirers and followers of Jesus, would be undergoing through
the trauma of this very moment in the rest of their life. After 40 or 60 years
they finally decide to write these accounts, may be to free their minds from
this intense feeling. It is hard to imagine, what they went through these
years. Each of them would have thought about the events of that day
continuously. (I myself think of my grand mothers death and cremation after 44
years). So, in their mind they attribute “thoughts” to what Jesus “said” and
“could have said”. While writing down, they summarized what they thought it
was. It was their account, what happened is immaterial to them. Future historians
did not matter to their emotional account. After 2000 years of the death of
Jesus, it may be unwise to determine what exactly he said at the time of that
gruesome moment.
So, like in Gandhiji’s case, I
makeup for myself. As Dr. Ehrman said, Jesus was not divine. May not be divine,
who knows how is divine. But, I think he was a great man, a leader. If the
apostles were his followers, he cannot be ordinary. If “some things” of what
are said and written can be attributed to him, he was a great man. He was
definitely wise. He felt for poor and suffering. He imagined a better life for
all. Like many, this character impressed me throughout my life. So, I would
like to think his last words were "Father, forgive them, for
they do not know what they do".
According
to oriental thinking, whenever righteousness in the society is diminished, God
appears to establish it by protecting the gentle and eliminating the wicked4.
It may be a fantasy for some, but I think these great men, like Budha,
Srikrishna, Jesus and Gandhi appear among us to serve this purpose. To give
hope to hopeless. What else an ordinary individual has to live until death in
many places where war, deadly disease, hunger and exploitation are rampant?
They die, for them nothing else happens until than. The stories of these great
men are relevant and history is irrelevant for them.
1Gandhiji: Mahatma Gandhi
was also called Gandhiji in reverence.
2
Ram:
Ram is believed to be an incarnation of God in Indian subcontinent. Ram lived a
life of most ideal human and ruled the nation in righteous manner. The period
of his ruling is known as “Ram Rajya” or “Kingdom of Ram”. Gandhiji was most
fond of Ram and wanted India to be like Kingdom of Ram after independence from
British.
3Birla House: This is the
house in New Delhi where Gandhi lived after independence of India and conducted
evening prayer. After prayer, he talked about the unity of Hindus and Muslims,
who were rioting following the partisan.
4This part is paraphrased
from the Bhagabat Gita (Chapter 4, verse 8): परित्राणाय साधुनाम विनाशाय च दुष्कृताम , धर्म संस्थापनार्थाय सम्भवामि युगे युगे (paritranaya sadhunam
vinasaya
ca duskrtam
dharma-samsthapanarthaya
sambhavami yuge yuge)
SYNONYMS: paritranaya--for the deliverance; sadhunam--of
the devotees; vinasaya--for the annihilation; ca--also; duskrtam--of
the miscreants; dharma--principles of religion; samsthapana-arthaya--to
reestablish; sambhavami--I do appear; yuge--millennium; yuge--after
millennium.
TRANSLATION: In
order to deliver the pious and to annihilate the miscreants, as well as to
reestablish the principles of religion, I advent Myself millennium after
millennium.
(These materials are taken from the book “Gita As it
is” By A. C. Bhaktivadent Prabhupad)
This blog was written after attending a lecture by Dr. Dr. Bart D. Ehrman, James A. Gray Distinguished Professor, Department of Religious Studies, University of North Carolina on "Does The Bible Present a Historically Accurate View of Jesus?". The lecture was held on Friday, October 3 at Oviatt Library Presentation Room, where getting a seat was not easy. Dr. Ehrman’s work focuses on textual criticism of the New Testament, the historical Jesus, and the development of early Christianity. Dr. Ehrman was raised an Episcopalian, had a “born again” experience in early high school, attended fundamentalist/evangelical Bible colleges (Moody Bible Institute, Wheaton College) where he trained for the ministry, and attended Princeton Theological Institute where he earned a master of divinity degree and a Ph.D. in New Testament studies. During his graduate studies of ancient languages and textual criticism, he became convinced of contradictions and discrepancies in the Bible that were irreconcilable with his born-again beliefs. He remained a liberal Christian for 15 years but later became an agnostic.
ReplyDeletePopular Books by Dr. Bart D. Ehrman
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why
God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question—Why We Suffer
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don’t Know About Them)
Forged: Writing in the Name of God—Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are
Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth
How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee
Balanced thought, unbiased presentation.
ReplyDeleteBalanced thought, unbiased presentation.
ReplyDeleteI am glad you liked it.
Delete