Mahatma Gandhi
Debi Prasad Choudhary
Los Angeles, 05/23/2025
Mahatma Gandhi memorial in the Main Street of downtown at 3735 Main Street, Riverside with a quotation "Live simply so that others may simply live".
My father was a Gandhian. He walked with Vinoba Bhave for Bhudan Andolan. In my childhood, he took me to Acharyya Harihar, one of the great Gandhians of Odisha to get blessing, who placed his hand on my head. From a poor family, he sincerely followed Gandhian leaders of Odisha in his youth. As a school headmaster, he led a village wide Gandhi Centenary celebration in 1969, when a stunning "Prabhat Fery" with "Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram" chainting was conducted to kick off the week long event. This also included recitation of Sri Mad Bhagawat Gita in local Raghunath Temple. I was in my 5th grade and received first prize for speech competition. My father used to take all students of the school to local river for "Teel Tarpan" (Offering of sesame seed and water to Gandhiji) for Gandhiji on every 30th January. I learned about Gandhiji mostly from my father, who was an honorable man in all respects. Later years, I visited all possible places related to Gandhiji and read Gandhian literature extensively. My spiritual Master asked me to read three books one of them being "My Experiments with the Truth" by Mahatma Gandhi, in which Gandhiji narrates incidents the were known only to him. Beyond those incidents, his life was so public that he had to make no effort to document himself. In Noakhali on the eve of the independence of India, he said "My life is my message". Later, many people wrote songs this sentence as a theme.
Some year ago, one of my relative said that there are new informations emerging that shows Gandhi was a hoax and all that I learned were false. I was obviously angry and tried to tell her what famous people said about Gandhiji, but she was learning stuff from newly emerging group extensive propaganda that it was impossible to to do anything. Apparently, there was a book entitled "Micha mahatma" The False Mahatma, that exposed the misdeeds of Gandhiji. More recently, one of my learned friends forwarded a Whatsapp post that said, "how long you can bow your head at Raj Ghat (The Samadhi of Gandhiji), now is the time to abandon him and embrace the true hiros". We had a debate, not so pleasant. In may last trip to India, I met a group of retired individuals in their late 60s, who were engineers, administrators or bankers. I heard that Gandhi was a cunning guy, who collaborated with Nehru, who had good grasp of english language. These two individuals, basically made a good fortune in early part of 20th century, and are responsible for the partition of India and all present mishary. These are good reasonable family people, and I did not know, how to start a conversation with them, that their understanding of the world is built with full of false hood.
This is the backdrop with which, I write this blog to record what people, who lived and interacted with Gandhiji, said about him. Here is to document that, if I am was misguided by my father, I am not alone, many great ones were in my category, who lived in the time of Gandhiji.
Sri C.V. Raman was known for his no-nonsense style dealing with people and a proud patriot. He had a long relationship with Mahatma Gandhi, who visited Raman Research Institute on one occasion where he discussed with him about "Charkha" and a possible national link language in Free India, according to the eyewitness Mahadevbhai Desai. Like my father, Sir Raman used to celebrate Gandhi Jayanti by delivering a public talk on latest developments of science. According to his wife Lokasundari Ammal, on his deathbed Raman said, "I believe only in the spirit of man… I have heard of godly men, Jesus, Buddha, and I have met a godly human being – Mahatma Gandhi". Such profound was the statement.
Sri Swami Chidananda, one of the distinguished personalities of spiritual seekers of modern India, worked briefly in Gandhian cause before coming to Sivananda Ashram in Rishikesh. He is a rare spiritual personality, who was curious about the God and his role in the creation throughout his life, a true seeker. He frequently mentioned Gandhiji in many of his discourses, few of which are quoted here. In a 1960 talk, he said, "Gandhiji’s life was a living example of divine life—service, truth, and love in action. His message of ahimsa and simplicity is a beacon for all seekers, showing that spirituality is not in isolation but in serving humanity with a pure heart". In 1993 World Parliament of Religion lecture in Chicago, he said, "Mahatma Gandhi, through his life of sacrifice and truth, showed the world that spirituality is not confined to ashrams but lived in the service of the oppressed and the pursuit of justice".
Albert Einstein is well known, who had a great admiration for Gandhiji. He wrote to The New York Times in 1948, "Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth". Like almost all theories of Einstein, this statement also became true just after less than 90 years.
Let us now turn to prominent Gandhi critics who lived in those days and passionately worked for the independence of India. Among them a Hindu nationalist leader Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, who envisaged a country for Hindus and violence as a means for achieving the goal said, "I am grateful to Mahatma Gandhi for his appeal for my release from the Andamans. His compassion reflects his noble character, though I differ with his political methods. His call for clemency strengthens my resolve to serve India, albeit through a different path". Even when he tried to make a case for the effectiveness of violence for a "Hindu Rashtra"in 1938, he said, "Mahatma Gandhi’s contribution to India’s awakening is unparalleled. His leadership has stirred millions, making the Congress a force against British rule. But his obsession with non-violence and his appeasement of Muslims weaken the Hindu cause. By advocating ahimsa in the face of aggression, he risks disarming Hindus against threats to our nationhood". Clearly, Mahatma Gandhi did not see people of a particular religion as fundamentally different species that was not the case for many other leaders of his time.
However, two other prominent critics of Gandhian era did not have any strong religious inclination. Bhagat Singh was one such intellectual revolutionary, who did not believe in nonviolent approach for freedom struggle, at least in optics. In a court testimony on Lahore conspiracy case 1929, he said, "We hold Mahatma Gandhi in high esteem for awakening the nation, but his path of non-violence is inadequate against an oppressive regime. Our bombs were not meant to kill but to make the deaf hear. Revolution is the inalienable right of mankind, and we choose it over passive resistance to shake the foundations of British rule". In 1930, he wrote to his father, "You must support your general, Mahatma Gandhi. Only then will you win independence for the country. My path differs, but his leadership unites the nation".
Subhash Chandra Bose, who invented the title "Father of the Nation" for Gandhiji had a deep respect that is reflected in his 1944 radio address, "Father of our Nation! In this holy war for India’s liberation, we ask for your blessings and good wishes. I am convinced that if we desire freedom, we must be prepared to wade through blood. Your non-violent campaigns have awakened the nation, but the time has come for a final assault on British imperialism. Your leadership has united us; now let us fight for complete independence". And, on a 1939 letter to Gandhiji he wrote, "Dear Mahatmaji, I have always tried to win your confidence, for it would be tragic if I failed to win the trust of India’s greatest man. Our differences on the means to achieve Swaraj are well-known, but I believe we can find common ground in our love for the motherland. I seek your guidance in forming the Working Committee, as the Tripuri resolution demands".
Gandhiji was not particularly advocating for non-violent struggle. He supported allied forces in second world war, in his 1942 letter to president Roosevelt he writes among others, "In order to make my proposal fool-proof I have suggested that, if the Allies think it necessary, they may keep their troops, at their own expense, in India, not for keeping internal order but for preventing Japanese aggression and defending China. So far as India is concerned, she must become free even as America and Great Britain are. The Allied troops will remain in India during the war under treaty with the Free India Government that may be formed by the people of India without any outside interference, direct or indirect". And Roosevelt replies, "I am sure that you will agree that the United States has consistently striven for and supported policies of fair dealing, of fair play, and of all related principles looking towards the creation of harmonious relations between nations. Nevertheless, now that war has come as a result of Axis dreams of world conquest, we, together with many other nations, are making a supreme effort to defeat those who would deny forever all hope of freedom throughout the world. I am enclosing a copy of an address of July 23 by the Secretary of State, made with my complete approval, which illustrates the attitude of this Government".
Gandhiji stated that his intellectual body was built with the milk of Srimad Bhagawat Gita. Sri Krishna says that He is Sri Ram among the possessor of arm. Sri Ram rarely used his woppen, only on one occasion for killing Ravan, the demon king. As Goswami Tulasidas writes in Sundara Kanda, the weapon of Sri Ram is only to keep peace, which was also the doctrine of President Ronald Reagan.
बिनय न मानत जलधि जड़ गए तीन दिन बीति। बोले राम सकोप तब भय बिनु होइ न प्रीति।।57।।
Mahatma Gandhi was concerned to use violence to build a sustainable nation for long term stability. Once the citizens taste the working of violence to achieve their desired result, the mighty will dominant. To start with it may be religion, but once a single religion starts dominating, the sub religion struggle will start and it would cascade to regional and cast based unending divisive violence. A harmonious society is only possible through mutual trust, respect and rarely use of necessary but limited force.
That said, in the end Gandhiji was a human being after all, with all its limitations. The only difference from others of his time, was that he struggled to find the right path and strived to use all possible rational means in his disposal to achieve them. He was not devoid of mortal limitations that anyone can have. He had strong views about social structure, women and on many issues that must be scrutinized. But, he always struggled to become more perfect through self examination by giving what he called appointment to self to listen to the inner voice. That made him evolve constantly in human ladder.
Gandhiji was killed by a groomed upper caste Brahmin man Nathuram Godse on his way to evening public prayer meeting. One of my esteemed colleague from Pune, suggested me that maybe that was a good thing that happened, as otherwise Mr. Gandhi would have emotionally blackmailed the elected government on new India to submit to his wishes. He said, if there was a conflict with paying the Pakistan share of pre-independent cash reserve and India blocked, that should have been resolved in international courts of some other legal way than the intervention of Gandhiji. Perhaps, that is true, especially because Gandhiji did not believe in majoritarian democracy. On one of the occasion Gandhiji said, "One with truth is majority". I would accept this view of the Mahatma, which is time tasted right path. In mahabharat war, one man soldier Sri Krishna was victorious against his own vast mighty army. The justice can not be a majoritarian opinion, rather a well considered wise consideration.
Let me conclude this blog by quoting from the script of Gandhi movie, by Richard Attenborough that captured the life of Gandhiji dramatically,
died as he had always lived -- a
private man without wealth, without
property, without official title or
office...
Mahatma Gandhi was not a commander
of great armies nor ruler of vast
lands, he could boast no scientific
achievements, no artistic gift...
Yet men, governments and dignitaries
from all over the world have joined
hands today to pay homage to this
little brown man in the loincloth
who led his country to freedom...
We see the throng, following the weapon-carrier bier of Gandhi
as it slowly inches its way along the Kingsway.
Mountbatten, tall, handsome, bemedalled, walks at the head
of dignitaries from many lands... and behind them a broad
mass of Indians. For a moment we see their sandalled feet
moving along the roadway and realize their quiet, rhythmic
shuffling is the only noise this vast assemblage has produced.
Pope Pius, the Archbishop of
Canterbury, President Truman, Chiang
Kai-shek, The Foreign Minister of
Russia, the President of France...
are among the millions here and abroad
who have lamented his passing. In
the words of General George C.
Marshall, the American Secretary of
State, "Mahatma Gandhi had become
the spokesman for the conscience of
mankind..."
That was the Mahatma Gandhi, my father followed in his youth. I have no doubt that my father was in right path and groomed me well to follow him. He (my father) was wise and did not want his son to be in illusion of initial apparent victory of evil that is short lived. Let me thank my father, who inspired me with the life of Gandhiji and the likes illustrating the teachings of Bhagawat Gita,
यत्तदग्रे विषमिव परिणामेऽमृतोपमम् | तत्सुखं सात्त्विकं प्रोक्तमात्मबुद्धिप्रसादजम् || 18.37||
That which seems like poison at first, but tastes like nectar in the end, is said to be happiness in the mode of goodness. It is generated by the pure intellect that is situated in self-knowledge.
----------------------------------
Bhudan Andolan: Land reform movement